Case Study of the Jewish Museum, Berlin

Contextual investigation of the Jewish Museum, Berlin The Jewish Museum Berlin consolidates the social and social history of the Germany after World War 2 and sought to compare with the impacts of the Holocaust on Jews in Germany. In his structure, Libeskind professed to join three principle ideas; the ineptitude to grasp the recorded plans of Germany without the information on the civilizational, scholastic and financial commitment that was made by the Jewish individuals in Berlin. Also he needed to catch the substantial and profound excursion in connection to the experience of the Holocaust and its repercussions the general public of Jews lastly he needed to offer some kind of reparation by the affirmation, expulsion and the consolidation of voids, through which Berlin can move however this time with compassionate presence. At the point when the development finished in 1999, the Director Michael Blumenthal pronounced that, â€Å"the boss point of the gallery will be to bring a feeling of the lavishness of Jewish social life in German y before the Holocaust† LIBESKINDS BOOK However, the Holocaust mixes the exhibition hall so emphatically the historical center has been called by analysts and pundits both â€Å"didactic† and â€Å"pedagogical† that the message is one for the present and, all the more significantly, for the future (BOOK MAKE UP). Since the setting of the Holocaust stays such a solid string in this space, it warrants assessment as an exceptional expansion to types memorializing the Holocaust. Also, the museum’s triumph in its enormous turnout rates especially with youngsters, in the course of the most recent decade requires an investigation of its unpredictability of plan and substance to see how the space performs to change the manner in which we see things.WHY HE WON? For Libeskind, who was worn in Poland, a coupl of hundred Kilemoters from Berlin and whose family crushed during the Holocaust, the venture introduced an opportunity to reconnect to his past. Both of his fol ks were captured by Soviet authorities when the Red Army and upon their arrival home and have invest some energy in inhumane imprisonment. Upon their arrival they discovered that 85 individuals from families had kicked the bucket on account of the Nazis. These encounters made Libeskind structure very close to home and in a sence one-sided. In a nterview to â€Å"Jewish Currents†, a Jewish on-line magazine that manages activism, governmental issues and workmanship Libeskind clarifies his methodology; â€Å"I would initially call attention to that it’s not a task that I needed to explore in a library or study in the documents since it is a piece of my experience, remembering my prompt foundation for each sense. My folks were Holocaust survivors and my uncle Nathan was one of the saints of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. I myself grew up as a Jew in post war Poland under very enemy of Semitic conditions. What's more, I’ve lived in Israel and New York. Surely that hist orical center is talking, both in reverse and advances, to numerous issues that are a piece of my Jewish sensibility†. Jewish Currents Just by watching the type of the structure, as of now the feeling of down to earth impact is assuming a huge job. The structure is unmistakable by its shining zinc dividers, topsy-turvy state of the crisscross structure with light infiltrating through topsy-turvy cuts reminiscent of the abhorrent wounds on Jewish nearness in Germany.

National Stock Exchange Free Essays

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED DEPARTMENT : FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS Download Ref. No. : NSE/FA/21156 Date : June 29, 2012 Circular Ref. We will compose a custom article test on National Stock Exchange or on the other hand any comparable theme just for you Request Now No. : 3/2012 To the exchanging individuals the FO and CD sections Sub : Levy of charges for High Order to Trade Ratio In continuation of Exchange Circular. No:NSE/CMTR/20662 dated April 30, 2012 on extra SEBI rules administering choice Support Tools/Algorithm for exchanging through Non-Neat front end and as coordinated by SEBI, Trading Members are thusly educated that the accompanying charges will be exacted for high algo request to exchange proportion with impact from July 02, 2012. The said charges will be registered at part level regularly and will be gathered on a month to month premise, in the wake of retribution all algo requests and exchanges of the part: Daily algo Order to Trade Ratio Less than 50 to under 250 (on gradual premise) 250 to under 500 (on steady premise) at least 500 than 500 (on gradual premise) * Charges (per algo orders) Nil 1 paise 5 paise 5 paise * on the off chance that the proportion is at least 500 than 500 during an exchanging day, the concerned part will not be allowed to put in any requests for the initial 15 minutes on the following exchanging day(in the ceaseless exchanging meeting) as a chilling activity. Be that as it may, the exchanging part will be allowed to enter exchanges in chance lessening mode in the separate fragments during such a chilling period. Individuals may take note of that with the end goal of computation of Daily Order-to-Trade proportion all algo orders, I. e. , request section, request adjustments and request scratch-offs will be thought of. Regd. Office : Exchange Plaza, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai †400 051 Page 1 of 2 It might additionally be noticed that, an) if the requests entered as well as altered are inside 1% of the last exchanged value (LTP) of the particular security/contract ((Absolute (Limit cost †LTP)/LTP) Step by step instructions to refer to National Stock Exchange, Essay models

How to Write a Michigan Community Essay

<h1>How to Write a Michigan Community Essay</h1><p>When you are composing a Michigan Community Essay, make certain to remember the accompanying tips. The accompanying article will give you a few hints on the most proficient method to compose your Michigan Community Essay, with the goal that you have a brilliant record that will be utilized in your secondary school or school affirmations essay.</p><p></p><p>First of all, you have to set aside the effort to compose a legitimate organization. There are a few sorts of organization accessible and you have to choose which one is best for you. You can write in standard arrangement, or a MLA position, which is unique in relation to the standard configuration, yet normally required in the event that you are composing an article for your college.</p><p></p><p>Next, you should recognize what kind of exposition you are composing. For instance, you can take a general article to app ly to a particular point. A progressively explicit article would require an increasingly explicit organization. Before you start your article, figure out which position you will be using.</p><p></p><p>One thing that you will need to ensure is to maintain a strategic distance from any syntactic slip-ups when composing your Michigan Community Essay. You may need to look at a portion of the language structure books at your neighborhood library or book shop. Ensure that you are looking at over the sentences cautiously to guarantee that it peruses well.</p><p></p><p>You likewise need to know the primary individual attributes that every individual has. For instance, on the off chance that you are composing a piece of your exposition on how you 'formed' an individual, at that point you would need to consider the zones that you accept molded the person.</p><p></p><p>Finally, understudies need to figure out how to struct ure their paper appropriately. You don't need to write in full sentences. Most understudies experience difficulty realizing where to stop, so they end up simply composing a lot of sentences.</p><p></p><p>Using these fundamental composing rules will make your exposition a lot simpler to compose. You won't just have the option to impart all the more plainly, however you will likewise have the option to meet better standards. Toward the day's end, you need to ensure that your exposition is composed well and you will have it out before your entrance advisory board when you go to campus.</p>

Venrock

Venrock INTRODUCTIONMartin: Hi, today we are in beautiful Palo Alto in the Venrock office. Hi, who are you and what do you do?Brian: I am Brian Ascher, partner here at Venrock.Martin: What is Venrock doing?Brian: So, Venrock is an early stage venture capital fund. It is one of the longest standing VC firms in the country and probably in the world. It got started actually in the 1930s as the VC arm of the Rockefeller family and we are in our timeline room where you can see some of the early investments back in the day when Laurence Rockefeller led companies back then the hot technology space, aerospace and rocketries, so Eastern Airlines, McDonald Aircraft, Piasecki Helicopter, Alaska airlines, they all got seed funding from Laurence Rockefeller and his advisors.Martin: Tell us about your story. So you have been quite long at Venrock, what did you do before?Brian: So before becoming a VC I was product manager at Intuit, responsible for the Quicken product family back in the early days of that product.Martin: And what made you become a venture capitalist?Brian: That’s a good question. I had some exposure to the industry while at business school and prior to that and it always seemed like an intriguing thing to do. So when I was wrapping up my work as a product manager I decided to apply to the Kauffmann fellowship which places folks early in their career into venture firms and I thought , “If I get in, I’ll see what that’s like and if not I will keep doing startups or something”. And I got in and I loved it and I consider a privilege to work with entrepreneurs, so I keep doing it.ABOUT VENROCK VCMartin: Can you briefly walk us through the typical investment due diligence process? S once a startup comes into your office in the beginning of the funnel,how it is proceeding?Brian: We try to be very flexible and really tailor the approach to the specifics of that company. I like to simplify it into three phases.So the first phase is we will have a meeting and I cons ider it a sniff test. Is there a mutual interest after a meeting and maybe a phone call or two and discussing it internally.If yes, then it moves into the second phase which I like to think of as the high order of it. This is kind of the most phases because it is when we will drill down on the most important critical few issues. So whatever that could be, it might understanding the competitive dynamics, better understanding the technology, understanding the market need, what have you. We try to do it quickly, a couple of weeks, sometimes faster. And it is really being efficient by getting through our network or through the company to the heart of the matter.And then the third phase is more of ‘Let’s leave no stone unturned ‘, let’s do management reference check, let’s make sure we have spoken to all of the customers, let’s go through the financial model, lets start to discuss what a deal might look like, let’s examine the cap table, let’s meet the whole partnership a nd we will decide and move towards a close.But really it is that second phase that the high order bid or the ‘bang for the buck’ phase where you try to really zero in on a does this make sense as an investment for Venrock and for you to have us as your partner.Martin: What is the typical conversion rate from phase 2 to phase 3?Brian: I’d say if it passes phase 2 it is reasonably high. We don’t tend to look at numbers very often but I’d say it’s the most important phase so maybe half.Martin: Ok, cool. And what is the typical time span or range of deals so maybe like form four weeks to ten months in terms of the whole process?Brian: Well, ten months would certainly be more of a case where it wasn’t right at that time, so we or they agreed, “Hey, we are going to revisit this several months down the road, six months down the road”. It happens quite a bit where for whatever reasons the company decides not to raise then or maybe they raised small round and they come to s ee us as with a status update, but rarely it takes us you know six months of rigorous analysis to get to an answer, that just doesn’t happen. We have done deals in as quickly as a week. It is not the most comfortable thing to do and I’d say it is not great for either side because it is a very important decision for the entrepreneur to know who they are getting hitched with for a long haul. And it is also really hard to really understand the business that quickly so I’d say the comfort zone starts at two weeks and maybe goes four to six weeks. But the difference, at least the way we do it is, once you have a term sheet we are really, really interested to invest and it is just legal due diligence from there and that almost never uncovers a problem.Martin: Brian, what is the sweet spot for an investment in terms of sizing or maybe business model industry?Brian: As far as size we are flexible.There is really no lower limit. It’s not that we have such a large fund, unless you can take a lot of money from us we are not interested. We could seed something for 500K, but a small check for a proper series A might be 3 or 4 million, but we have written checks as large as 10 or 11 or 12. That is a big check for us. And then our expectation is that over the life of the company we may have to double the investment or even triple it sometimes. Really depends on how the capital intensive the business is and what we think the future fundraising looks like.As far as sectors we are quite broad in our coverage of both life science and that is everything from healthcare IT, the biotech and diagnostics and medical devices. And then on the IT side it is everything from infrastructure like security or virtualization to enterprise applications, whether horizontal SaaS like a marketing technology company or vertical solutions in finance or retail or healthcare on up to consumer place.Martin: What health industries or sectors do you find very interesting or promising for the nex t two or three years? Seeing that the SaaS market was very hot over the last two or three years for example.Brian: I have a theme that is most interesting to me and it is the notion that the software is becoming intelligent. And what I mean by that is you are taking data technologies or approaches rather, like machine learning, predicative analytics, artificial intelligence, although that word is probably overused, and using it to actually answer a business problem or use the computer to provide an actual recommendation to an end user. Because if you think about what software has historically been is really a database with a UI on top. That is what salesforce.com is or CRM is or has been because they are changing, trying to add more intelligence to their app. It is a place that stores customer records and it has got an UI customized to that task and to get the value you have to run a report or look at the records and decide up in your brain what inference you would make, what action you would take and how to drive that through the organization. Quicken was really the same thing; it was a place you stored transactions and we had a checkbook metaphor and you can run reports and look up a pie chart and figure out where your spending in going and then decide, “Oh I should spend less, I should create budget and do all of that.” Whereas now with machine learning and artificial intelligence you can have the app decide, “I am going to recommend for you ways for you to save money or achieve your financial goals, send your kid to college, retire comfortably. Or in the B2B setting the software can actually tell you which prospective buyers are out there, showing intent in the marketplace that you are not even aware of. Here is how they much they are going to buy, what they are going to buy, when they are going to buy it and here is the message you should deliver to reach out to them, based on the interest that the software is seeing either on your electronic channe ls or across the web through various data sources.So I think there is a profound difference what software will do, not just in terms of how it is deployed or delivered which is the advantage for taking it from off premise to cloud but really the value. I think it is creating more value for the end user, requiring them to do less work to get the value.Martin: When you look at predictive analysis apps are you more looking at infrastructure companies or are you looking at SaaS models who are just solving some unique niche problems for some companies for example? Or are you looking at a company that owns really exclusive data sources for example?Brian: So there are definitely infrastructure opportunities. It is not where I focus my efforts. I am focused on the app. And really the key to the app is often times really understanding the domain and the problem and the customer need well enough to know what data you would want and then how to create the answers coming out of that data. It is rarely about cutting edge math. The math isn’t easy and it is sophisticated but no one is inventing new math to come up with the answer. It is really all in problem definition, there is often a lot of data cleansing work that goes on there is a lot cleverness you need and sourcing the data. Sometimes there may be unique and proprietary data. A lot of times that is more of a business model and a biz dev kind of advantage. If you can create a networkeffect even better, so you have more data than the competitors. But really it is so much more about understanding the domain and then presenting it to user experience that lets the business user or the consumer solve their problem in a quick and delightful way.Martin: What kind of interesting stories did you experienced over the last 18 years with entrepreneurs where you say, “Wow, this was very interesting, this was a problem and entrepreneur occurred and that is how he racked it or I and some of my partners gave them some helpful ad vice”?Brian: Great question. I’d say that the big observation is just how rare the true force of nature entrepreneur is. And by force of nature we mean that person for whom failure is just not an option and they will keep coming at the problem and modifying their approach if they need to and just make a much bigger outcome or company than the innate market suggested was possible.And so when you are in the presence of a truly great entrepreneur who just exudes that sort of drive and energy and creativity and combines this optimism for the future with the pragmatic sense of what it is going to take to get moving today. You don’t want to overthink your way out of doing those kinds of investment based on “Oh, well what if this goes wrong or that goes wrong”, because that great entrepreneur will figure it out, hopefully it will help as well. But it is remarkable how there is so much that is possible that you might envision at the outset and so it is a great entrepreneur that ta kes you there.Martin: Many people think that we are currently at the brink of a bubble bursting. What is your perspective on that?Brian: I don’t feel like it is a bubble that we had in let’s say in 2000 or even 2008. I think the public markets have remained largely disciplined on valuation. You have some late stage private valuations that have gotten crazy but fundamentally the basis of innovation is incredible right now.There is so many technology catalysts, social catalysts, industries willing to adapt cloud or technology based solutions that I feel really good at the real innovation, real value that is being created. And so if the late stage private markets cool off a little bit that is ok, that is not going to create some huge explosion and nuclear winner like we had in 2000, 2001, 02, 03. I think there is a little bit of market cycle on the late stage stuff but the early stage I think hasn’t gotten quite so overheated because there is still so much risk in the beginning, particularly because it is obvious that there is still a lot of traction. I don’t spend that much time worrying about timing the market as far as our investments go.Martin: When you look at an entrepreneur coming to you and pitching for an idea and you are an early stage investor, how do you balance the evaluation of the founder or the founder team with the business idea or the business model that is currently “The plan”?Brian: It comes back a little bit toâ€" if you really hate the idea it is hard to meet someone who is so compelling you are going to follow them into the idea you is just don’t believe in. But if the idea seems a little small, but generally ok, like a good idea you’re just not sure how big, a good entrepreneur is worth backing his idea. You really can never tell just how big an opportunity will be because there are always opportunities that present themselves once you get into the market and the customers start telling you what else they want, etc. But for us we are really people centric so it is more people first and market second. There is a school of thought the opposite approach is ‘Give me a huge market and I will find a team’. It is just really hard to match a great team and pull one together and make sure that they are cohesive and was it their initial idea or not.I think there is something special about a founding team that came up with the idea, feels ownership in every fiber of their body and it is going to walk through walls or through fire to make it successful and passing by that by bringing in professional management I think kills some of the magic. So ideally you are starting with a great team in an interesting market and then it gets even more exciting as they find their way to the sweet spot.Martin: Brian, imagine you have 10 entrepreneurs in front of you. How do you really identify the great entrepreneur and also identify the not so great ones?Brian: It is really hard and there are always surprises and I don’ t think anyone had had it figured out perfectly. But so common traits areâ€" smart is a given, there are a lot of smart people around the world and so it is highly necessary but insufficient.I think the great entrepreneurs have a personal energy and enthusiasm and it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are the life of the party with the lampshade on their head, but you can just tell that their conviction and passion around an ideaand it permeates everything they do and every conversation you have. Then, I think they also have pragmatic sense of “I face a lot of challenges right now, but where I am going is great. And they are kind of diametrically opposed in a way because you don’t want someone who is just dismissive of all the challenges they have today, “All is great, oh we have this problem solved, we have nothing else to learn.” That is probably not a healthy attitude, nor is a one that is constantly worried about, “We are going to fail, this is wrong” and they are shooting to a nice safe outcome, not a big outcome. So if you can do both â€" be abundantly optimistic about the future and really pragmatic and disciplined about the present, that is important.The best entrepreneurs have this mental agility or flexibility to be constantly taking in feedback and adjusting. And it is not a big pivot, so to speak, but just all those little adjustments that you need to find your way to the sweet spot of a market and a solution.I guess the last thing I would say is the best entrepreneurs tend not to get defensive. They can take tough questioning and respond appropriately or with good answers or admission that, “Hey, that is a risk. I don’t know. We are going to figure that over time but that is a risk you as an investor need to be willing to accept along with me”. Because I think however hard questions coming from an investor might be, the challenges that the market throws at you, competitors throw you, the key executive throws at you, those are m uch harder problems than a venture capitalist questions. And I think that great entrepreneurs realize that and take them in stride and respond with their best shot at an answer or an answer which says, “I don’t know yet. I will figure it out.”ADVICE TO ENTREPRENEURS FROM BRIAN ASCHER In Palo Alto (CA), we meet Partner at Venrock, Brian Ascher. Brian talks about how he became a venture capitalist and what his major learnings for entrepreneurs are.INTRODUCTIONMartin: Hi, today we are in beautiful Palo Alto in the Venrock office. Hi, who are you and what do you do?Brian: I am Brian Ascher, partner here at Venrock.Martin: What is Venrock doing?Brian: So, Venrock is an early stage venture capital fund. It is one of the longest standing VC firms in the country and probably in the world. It got started actually in the 1930s as the VC arm of the Rockefeller family and we are in our timeline room where you can see some of the early investments back in the day when Laurence Rockefeller led companies back then the hot technology space, aerospace and rocketries, so Eastern Airlines, McDonald Aircraft, Piasecki Helicopter, Alaska airlines, they all got seed funding from Laurence Rockefeller and his advisors.Martin: Tell us about your story. So you have been quite long at Venr ock, what did you do before?Brian: So before becoming a VC I was product manager at Intuit, responsible for the Quicken product family back in the early days of that product.Martin: And what made you become a venture capitalist?Brian: That’s a good question. I had some exposure to the industry while at business school and prior to that and it always seemed like an intriguing thing to do. So when I was wrapping up my work as a product manager I decided to apply to the Kauffmann fellowship which places folks early in their career into venture firms and I thought , “If I get in, I’ll see what that’s like and if not I will keep doing startups or something”. And I got in and I loved it and I consider a privilege to work with entrepreneurs, so I keep doing it.ABOUT VENROCK VCMartin: Can you briefly walk us through the typical investment due diligence process? S once a startup comes into your office in the beginning of the funnel,how it is proceeding?Brian: We try to be very flex ible and really tailor the approach to the specifics of that company. I like to simplify it into three phases.So the first phase is we will have a meeting and I consider it a sniff test. Is there a mutual interest after a meeting and maybe a phone call or two and discussing it internally.If yes, then it moves into the second phase which I like to think of as the high order of it. This is kind of the most phases because it is when we will drill down on the most important critical few issues. So whatever that could be, it might understanding the competitive dynamics, better understanding the technology, understanding the market need, what have you. We try to do it quickly, a couple of weeks, sometimes faster. And it is really being efficient by getting through our network or through the company to the heart of the matter.And then the third phase is more of ‘Let’s leave no stone unturned ‘, let’s do management reference check, let’s make sure we have spoken to all of the cust omers, let’s go through the financial model, lets start to discuss what a deal might look like, let’s examine the cap table, let’s meet the whole partnership and we will decide and move towards a close.But really it is that second phase that the high order bid or the ‘bang for the buck’ phase where you try to really zero in on a does this make sense as an investment for Venrock and for you to have us as your partner.Martin: What is the typical conversion rate from phase 2 to phase 3?Brian: I’d say if it passes phase 2 it is reasonably high. We don’t tend to look at numbers very often but I’d say it’s the most important phase so maybe half.Martin: Ok, cool. And what is the typical time span or range of deals so maybe like form four weeks to ten months in terms of the whole process?Brian: Well, ten months would certainly be more of a case where it wasn’t right at that time, so we or they agreed, “Hey, we are going to revisit this several months down the road, six months down the road”. It happens quite a bit where for whatever reasons the company decides not to raise then or maybe they raised small round and they come to see us as with a status update, but rarely it takes us you know six months of rigorous analysis to get to an answer, that just doesn’t happen. We have done deals in as quickly as a week. It is not the most comfortable thing to do and I’d say it is not great for either side because it is a very important decision for the entrepreneur to know who they are getting hitched with for a long haul. And it is also really hard to really understand the business that quickly so I’d say the comfort zone starts at two weeks and maybe goes four to six weeks. But the difference, at least the way we do it is, once you have a term sheet we are really, really interested to invest and it is just legal due diligence from there and that almost never uncovers a problem.Martin: Brian, what is the sweet spot for an investment in terms of si zing or maybe business model industry?Brian: As far as size we are flexible.There is really no lower limit. It’s not that we have such a large fund, unless you can take a lot of money from us we are not interested. We could seed something for 500K, but a small check for a proper series A might be 3 or 4 million, but we have written checks as large as 10 or 11 or 12. That is a big check for us. And then our expectation is that over the life of the company we may have to double the investment or even triple it sometimes. Really depends on how the capital intensive the business is and what we think the future fundraising looks like.As far as sectors we are quite broad in our coverage of both life science and that is everything from healthcare IT, the biotech and diagnostics and medical devices. And then on the IT side it is everything from infrastructure like security or virtualization to enterprise applications, whether horizontal SaaS like a marketing technology company or vertical solutions in finance or retail or healthcare on up to consumer place.Martin: What health industries or sectors do you find very interesting or promising for the next two or three years? Seeing that the SaaS market was very hot over the last two or three years for example.Brian: I have a theme that is most interesting to me and it is the notion that the software is becoming intelligent. And what I mean by that is you are taking data technologies or approaches rather, like machine learning, predicative analytics, artificial intelligence, although that word is probably overused, and using it to actually answer a business problem or use the computer to provide an actual recommendation to an end user. Because if you think about what software has historically been is really a database with a UI on top. That is what salesforce.com is or CRM is or has been because they are changing, trying to add more intelligence to their app. It is a place that stores customer records and it has got an U I customized to that task and to get the value you have to run a report or look at the records and decide up in your brain what inference you would make, what action you would take and how to drive that through the organization. Quicken was really the same thing; it was a place you stored transactions and we had a checkbook metaphor and you can run reports and look up a pie chart and figure out where your spending in going and then decide, “Oh I should spend less, I should create budget and do all of that.” Whereas now with machine learning and artificial intelligence you can have the app decide, “I am going to recommend for you ways for you to save money or achieve your financial goals, send your kid to college, retire comfortably. Or in the B2B setting the software can actually tell you which prospective buyers are out there, showing intent in the marketplace that you are not even aware of. Here is how they much they are going to buy, what they are going to buy, when they ar e going to buy it and here is the message you should deliver to reach out to them, based on the interest that the software is seeing either on your electronic channels or across the web through various data sources.So I think there is a profound difference what software will do, not just in terms of how it is deployed or delivered which is the advantage for taking it from off premise to cloud but really the value. I think it is creating more value for the end user, requiring them to do less work to get the value.Martin: When you look at predictive analysis apps are you more looking at infrastructure companies or are you looking at SaaS models who are just solving some unique niche problems for some companies for example? Or are you looking at a company that owns really exclusive data sources for example?Brian: So there are definitely infrastructure opportunities. It is not where I focus my efforts. I am focused on the app. And really the key to the app is often times really understa nding the domain and the problem and the customer need well enough to know what data you would want and then how to create the answers coming out of that data. It is rarely about cutting edge math. The math isn’t easy and it is sophisticated but no one is inventing new math to come up with the answer. It is really all in problem definition, there is often a lot of data cleansing work that goes on there is a lot cleverness you need and sourcing the data. Sometimes there may be unique and proprietary data. A lot of times that is more of a business model and a biz dev kind of advantage. If you can create a networkeffect even better, so you have more data than the competitors. But really it is so much more about understanding the domain and then presenting it to user experience that lets the business user or the consumer solve their problem in a quick and delightful way.Martin: What kind of interesting stories did you experienced over the last 18 years with entrepreneurs where you say , “Wow, this was very interesting, this was a problem and entrepreneur occurred and that is how he racked it or I and some of my partners gave them some helpful advice”?Brian: Great question. I’d say that the big observation is just how rare the true force of nature entrepreneur is. And by force of nature we mean that person for whom failure is just not an option and they will keep coming at the problem and modifying their approach if they need to and just make a much bigger outcome or company than the innate market suggested was possible.And so when you are in the presence of a truly great entrepreneur who just exudes that sort of drive and energy and creativity and combines this optimism for the future with the pragmatic sense of what it is going to take to get moving today. You don’t want to overthink your way out of doing those kinds of investment based on “Oh, well what if this goes wrong or that goes wrong”, because that great entrepreneur will figure it out, hopef ully it will help as well. But it is remarkable how there is so much that is possible that you might envision at the outset and so it is a great entrepreneur that takes you there.Martin: Many people think that we are currently at the brink of a bubble bursting. What is your perspective on that?Brian: I don’t feel like it is a bubble that we had in let’s say in 2000 or even 2008. I think the public markets have remained largely disciplined on valuation. You have some late stage private valuations that have gotten crazy but fundamentally the basis of innovation is incredible right now.There is so many technology catalysts, social catalysts, industries willing to adapt cloud or technology based solutions that I feel really good at the real innovation, real value that is being created. And so if the late stage private markets cool off a little bit that is ok, that is not going to create some huge explosion and nuclear winner like we had in 2000, 2001, 02, 03. I think there is a litt le bit of market cycle on the late stage stuff but the early stage I think hasn’t gotten quite so overheated because there is still so much risk in the beginning, particularly because it is obvious that there is still a lot of traction. I don’t spend that much time worrying about timing the market as far as our investments go.Martin: When you look at an entrepreneur coming to you and pitching for an idea and you are an early stage investor, how do you balance the evaluation of the founder or the founder team with the business idea or the business model that is currently “The plan”?Brian: It comes back a little bit toâ€" if you really hate the idea it is hard to meet someone who is so compelling you are going to follow them into the idea you is just don’t believe in. But if the idea seems a little small, but generally ok, like a good idea you’re just not sure how big, a good entrepreneur is worth backing his idea. You really can never tell just how big an opportunity will be because there are always opportunities that present themselves once you get into the market and the customers start telling you what else they want, etc. But for us we are really people centric so it is more people first and market second. There is a school of thought the opposite approach is ‘Give me a huge market and I will find a team’. It is just really hard to match a great team and pull one together and make sure that they are cohesive and was it their initial idea or not.I think there is something special about a founding team that came up with the idea, feels ownership in every fiber of their body and it is going to walk through walls or through fire to make it successful and passing by that by bringing in professional management I think kills some of the magic. So ideally you are starting with a great team in an interesting market and then it gets even more exciting as they find their way to the sweet spot.Martin: Brian, imagine you have 10 entrepreneurs in front o f you. How do you really identify the great entrepreneur and also identify the not so great ones?Brian: It is really hard and there are always surprises and I don’t think anyone had had it figured out perfectly. But so common traits areâ€" smart is a given, there are a lot of smart people around the world and so it is highly necessary but insufficient.I think the great entrepreneurs have a personal energy and enthusiasm and it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are the life of the party with the lampshade on their head, but you can just tell that their conviction and passion around an ideaand it permeates everything they do and every conversation you have. Then, I think they also have pragmatic sense of “I face a lot of challenges right now, but where I am going is great. And they are kind of diametrically opposed in a way because you don’t want someone who is just dismissive of all the challenges they have today, “All is great, oh we have this problem solved, we have noth ing else to learn.” That is probably not a healthy attitude, nor is a one that is constantly worried about, “We are going to fail, this is wrong” and they are shooting to a nice safe outcome, not a big outcome. So if you can do both â€" be abundantly optimistic about the future and really pragmatic and disciplined about the present, that is important.The best entrepreneurs have this mental agility or flexibility to be constantly taking in feedback and adjusting. And it is not a big pivot, so to speak, but just all those little adjustments that you need to find your way to the sweet spot of a market and a solution.I guess the last thing I would say is the best entrepreneurs tend not to get defensive. They can take tough questioning and respond appropriately or with good answers or admission that, “Hey, that is a risk. I don’t know. We are going to figure that over time but that is a risk you as an investor need to be willing to accept along with me”. Because I think howev er hard questions coming from an investor might be, the challenges that the market throws at you, competitors throw you, the key executive throws at you, those are much harder problems than a venture capitalist questions. And I think that great entrepreneurs realize that and take them in stride and respond with their best shot at an answer or an answer which says, “I don’t know yet. I will figure it out.”ADVICE TO ENTREPRENEURS FROM BRIAN ASCHERMartin: Brian, you have seen so many entrepreneurs. What type of learnings that youhave seen them make and based on this what type of advice could you give them to avoid some unnecessary mistakes?Brian: I think some of the best entrepreneurs are constantly upgrading their team. And that sounds obvious, “Oh everyone does that”, but the reality is the following; you have a founding team of co-foundersand early team members who go through some really, really tough days, long, long nights, weekends, setbacks all the time. And so there i s a lot of loyalty that develops there. As you are growing and maybe things are going great or they are going well but there are problems, the thought of taking that person who was there from the beginning and bringing someone in top or even letting them go is actually pretty hard. And if they are doing a pretty good job you are even less likely to make that change because you feel the sense of loyalty or “I have got bigger problems to solve than the fact that my VP of sales is a B+ and not an A.” But I think the reality is that you constantly have to be striving to have all A players in every single position around your leadership table because any one weakness can have a ripple effects and lead to problems that sneak up on you. They are not glaring problems immediately, those you actually act on but it is the problem that, “Oh, boy, we felt like we didn’t need a CFO until we were planning an IPO and as a result we are in all these contracts that have all these weird clause s and our margins are all completely off and we are drowning in complexity.” And these are the problems that just sneak up on you after a couple of years without ever screaming, “Solve me now!” And that is one of the problems that good entrepreneurs intuitively know and many people have to learn the hard way.Martin: What other kind of advice can you share?Brian: I see another area that I feel really strongly about is the manner in which an entrepreneur approaches true partnership with their investors or their board. And by true partnership I mean way beyond just taking their money and then keeping them off your back which I think is sometimes what an entrepreneur would default to doing but rather creating this true partnership of trust. And I think there is a virtuous circle that develops if you do that well. And then unfortunately there is a negative circle of mistrust which can also develop if you don’t do it.So the positive trust loop is you as an entrepreneur recognize t hat, “My board is here to make me successful. They want this company to succeed and the same goes for my investors. And they realize that there will be problems and if I bring the problems to them early they will hopefully help me solve those problems. But even if they don’t, they will at least know that I am aware of them and I am working hard at finding solutions. And so the next time they have a question in their mind, they will know that they can ask me or they can have confidence that it is going to be addressed.” This way there is more and more positive trust going back and forth.The negative loop is really, really insidious which is, “I have a problem as an entrepreneur, I am worried to tell my board so I keep it to myself in the hopes that I will solve the problem and it will go away before I have to admit it to anybody.” The board usually senses, “Oh, there is something going on here”, and you can either see it in their numbers or even if it doesn’t show up in the numbers yet you just get a sense that something is just not quite right but the CEO is not telling me so I have to dig harder to find what is really going on and once I do I say “Ah-ha I knew it, there was a problem and you didn’t tell me and now I trust you even less. So I start to wonder if there are other problems I don’t know about “. And then you start asking your CEO, or digging on your own and they get even more paranoid and the whole thing spirals out of control in a very unproductive way.So I think it really incumbent on the board and the investors to react constructively when problems are brought to them because that is what you want. So I am of the mindset which does not say, “Don’t bring me a problem unless you also have a solution. No, no bring me problems early and often. That is my job; it is to help you solve problems. We can celebrate victories but we are going to do this amount of time and most of the time is going to spend on how do we get even better.Martin: And how do you define the significance level of problems that should be shared and problems that are so minor that should not be shared?Brian: There is really no bright line or rule or dollar amount or anything like that. So I don’t mind if they over communicate. I’d say the judgment call is around; what would be the strategic significance in the short, medium or long term. If it is going to be a short strategic issue, like a big partner just cancelled, absolutely. But you can even take problems that “Hey, it is ok now but I think it could turn into a problem, let’s talk about it”. If it is something like, “The lunch was delivered late today” or “the employees are leaving the kitchen too messy”, I don’t need to know about that.Generally, it is a calibration exercise. Bring the problems early and often and then you could together figure out what really needs to come and also what you get value from me. If you are bringing small problems but I am hel pful keep bringing them as long as you find value. I will probably never say, “Hey, don’t bother me with that. That is like beneath me”. In venture capital is kind of messy, and so I will help with anything you need help with. As long as I can be helpful, I’ll do it for you.Martin: Are there any more advices you can give especially on the investment side for entrepreneurs?Brian: My advice on fundraising would really be two things:One is it has become more popular to not use a deck presentation when pitching investors and I think there are certain circumstance like we may be meeting six months ahead of when you plan to fundraise and we want just to get to know you. Do we have some chemistry? Can we talk about the business in a free form way? Just exchange of ideas and if we are doing that, its fine, no need to come with a PowerPoint, that would be weird. But if you are actually In a fundraise mode where you are going to try and drive investment groups to make a decision as qu ick as possible I think it is really helpful to have a guided roadmap to the discussion, keeps you on track, makes sure to get me the information I need in the manner that you want me to have. And most importantly there is a lot of data, like if you want a strong financing and a strong valuation you are probably going to have some element of traction in there and even if you haven’t launched yet you are going to want me to have details of the team or the technology, there is almost always numbers and you just can’t talk through a complex graph of numbers. So you have to have some way to communicate with numbers and quantification and that is going to be with the deck. You could say, “I will send you the deck later” but there is a golden opportunity. We have each carved out 60 minutes from our schedule, so put the best foot forward right there in the meeting. It doesn’t mean it has to be a long deck or that you have to hand me your entire financial model, just a really well -crafted argument, point by point, at the end of which I applaud and am begging you to take my money. That is my philosophy on having a great presentation and the beauty is there is never a wrong time to have a great presentation because as an entrepreneur you are not only pitching investors but you will have opportunities to talk to the press, to present at conferences, to tell your story to executives you are recruiting, so having a well-crafted story line and summary deck is always useful, never a bad time to have that perfected.The second thing would be this notion of a combination of optimistic and pragmatic is to come in and not lose credibility by appearing naïve. Showing financials that are the best financials anyone has ever achieved in the world or a market size that is trillions and trillions of dollars even though your addressable piece is much smaller but you are promoting the trillions and trillions of spending that goes on in this category, not even for technology bu t for everything. Just really showing the balance and demonstrating that you really understand the domain extremely, extremely well even if you are not from it but you are coming in as an outsider just to disrupt it. You have done your homework, you intimately understand your customers’ pain and you have a pragmatic sense of all the challenges that it will take to solve this problem and being open about that. Because again it comes back to the trust loop, the investor can say, “Oh this person really knows their stuff”, not “This person is crazy, they have no idea how hard this is going to be”. Show me you know how hard it is going to be but then compel me you are going to get there anyway. That is an interesting business.Martin: Great! Brian, thank you so much for your time.Brian: Thank you for your interest. This was fun.Martin: Next time you are thinking about pitching to an investor craft your story very neatly so Brian or other investors are really happy to invest in y our business. Thank you so much.

The Downside Risk of The Electoral College Hamiltons Federalist Papers That No One Is Talking About

<h1> The Downside Risk of The Electoral College Hamilton's Federalist Papers That No One Is Talking About</h1> <p>It's totally likely that voter aloofness in the USA is because of the conviction held by numerous residents that their vote won't have any effect on the consequences of the Presidential political decision. It most likely wouldn't be basic to venture to such an extreme as every region requiring its own senator. It's substantially more hard to win that sort of political race for a revolutionary than it is to win just a single political decision broadly. Some idea the people couldn't strategically come out to partake in a national political decision. </p> <p>They investigated the situation. The main inquiry will be redistricting. It's rash and down right perilous once you're talking about the administration. Too bad, the issue is that governmental issues have changed since 1787. </p> <p>If that is the situation, each state's designation would choose a possibility for a coalition. It is hard to envision the more minimal states concurring. The underlying two decisions were basically inescapable results for Washington, so there was no interest for bunches of pondering. In 1824, no one won an Electoral College or a most loved vote dominant part. </p> <p>They didn't have to pander to the majority. Regardless of whether there's a lion's share, it would be progressively hard for them to cooperate because of the high number of individuals and the reality they are spread out in a bigger region. This is the motivation behind why the U.S. isn't where hordes rule. With such men the intensity of procuring arrangements could be securely held up. </p> <p>Madison was against the idea of an unadulterated Democracy. Subject to the Hamilton meaning of groups as both lion's share and minority gatherings, it's extremely evident that in spite of the fact that the Democrats may win the main part of the vote based inside this populace, Hamilton and the Founders think this is a hazardous way to deal with win a political decision. Hamilton contends against a fanatic who makes an alliance of only a few urban areas. </p> <h2> Most Noticeable Electoral College Hamilton's Federalist Papers </h2> <p>Additionally, there are a few third or in any case autonomous gatherings. A presidential applicant must intrigue a wide assortment of people. 1 method of changing the framework is to dispose of the victor take all bit of it. </p> <p>Among the characteristic shortcomings in an administration reliant on the desire of the individuals is the chance of anarchy. At that point, you're examine that substance to find what perspectives permit it to be great. There is, moreover, the issue of disappointment. There are numerous issues with this detailing. </p> <h2> Whispered the Electoral College Hamilton's Federalist Papers Secrets</h2> <p>To start with, upholding the conservative could turn into a tight spot. The framework makes it somewhat difficult to challenge races. Our framework is very straightforward. Extra the discretionary school framework may energize a more elevated level of resident support in governmental issues and cultivate a higher level of political comprehension. </p> <p>The 2 states which don't have a champ takes-all framework are Maine and Nebraska. The critical expression here is certainty of the whole Union. As to defilement, the circumstance isn't supposable. Rather, the genuine trial of an incredible government is its fitness and inclination to make an awesome organization. </p> <p>There are loads of potential changes that could happen in the state level. To some level, that level of partisanship is a to some degree ongoing improvement. There are just a couple of rules with respect to the capabilities of Electors. Most nonetheless, are clueless when it respects the advantages our current framework gives. </p> <p>The Constitution itself is quiet with respect to the points of interest of the balloters. It is among the most distinguished accomplishments of our Founders and should be worshipped all things considered. It's a Constitutional Republic. Those balloters presently face a hard other option. </p> <p>When the gathering got in progress, it took more than two hours for the vote to start. It is California's center finger to individuals who don't accept in light of the fact that they do. The ideological groups in each and every state pick imminent balloters before the general political decision. With a president who's thought inconsistently unqualified for the working environment. </p>

Dance Essay Topics - Choosing the Best Essay Topic

<h1>Dance Essay Topics - Choosing the Best Essay Topic</h1><p>There are a wide range of move exposition subjects. It is imperative to pick one that you will appreciate composing. Numerous understudies appreciate composing on the subject of what they love about move. These points may incorporate individual move recollections, the move moves that you locate the most satisfying, or something along those lines.</p><p></p><p>When picking exposition themes, remember that you need your paper to be intelligent of your style. You need to have the option to communicate your own musings and sentiments when composing your article. It ought not be exhausting, dull, or feel like an errand. Your article ought to be intriguing, connecting with, and you ought to have the option to have a fabulous time composing it. All things considered, you would need your understudies to like you and need to peruse your exposition too!</p><p></p><p>I n expansion to this, your paper themes ought to be founded on your experience level. For instance, in the event that you are a tenderfoot, you might need to pick subjects that are progressively specialized. You would prefer not to invest a lot of energy talking about move steps that you have never performed in light of the fact that you may put on a show of being exhausting to your students.</p><p></p><p>You additionally need to choose themes that are equipped towards your character. This can be hard to do, particularly on the off chance that you are not entirely alright with composing. Nonetheless, when you begin, it is anything but difficult to expound on things that you truly appreciate. You can even think of your own subjects on points that you are keen on. Try not to feel like you have to take another person's recommendation on this, since it is up to you.</p><p></p><p>Finally, you need to pick points that are testing. Attempt to be innovative in your selection of points, yet don't try too hard. You need to ensure that your articles are sufficiently moving to keep you intrigued, yet not all that troublesome that it gets repetitive. Having a fabulous time is the main thing that you need to accomplish here.</p><p></p><p>Remember that you would prefer not to constrain yourself to just a single subject. There is no mischief in having a go at something new at any rate once, however stay with one subject for some time. What's more, try not to be hesitant to expound on different parts of move other than simply move. This is the most ideal approach to grow your insight and get thoughts that you might not have thought of.</p><p></p><p>Another incredible approach to extend your insight is to peruse as much as possible on the subject of move. Discover as much as possible about various styles and about various nations. Become acquainted with different move steps and moving styles. You may even have the option to go to move shows or look into melodies that are utilized in dance.</p><p></p><p>After looking into move article subjects, you will be well headed to finding a theme that you will appreciate composing. You may need to rehash a portion of these tips, yet it is essential to begin with them. It is a good thought to allow your interests to appear and to let your character radiate through when expounding on subjects you love.</p>

The Various Types Of Junior High Research Paper Topics

<h1>The Various Types Of Junior High Research Paper Topics</h1><p>Junior high research paper subjects are amazingly famous on the grounds that they can be utilized by understudies to assist them with finding the ideal method to communicate. The pleasant thing about the middle school themes is that there are a variety of decisions that you can browse with regards to making your papers. A portion of the themes that you may look over incorporate music, wellbeing, nature, strict points, and even subjects that manage emotions.</p><p></p><p>Music is one of the most famous points that you can make your paper around. This can be a result of the way that there are a few understudies who have extremely solid emotions about specific groups. It could likewise be on the grounds that the topic on music is the thing that attracts them to it.</p><p></p><p>A exceptionally fascinating thing to note is that there are numerous different u nderstudies who don't have the foggiest idea about that there are groups that they by and by appreciate tuning in to. This is the reason it is significant for understudies to find out about this and how they can start to discuss them in their papers. Since it is normally best to let the understudies communicate in an alternate manner, you should consider utilizing a point that centers around a specific band or gathering of groups. For instance, if you somehow happened to discuss certain groups that attention on tunes that have been recorded as unique tunes and not ones that are secured, at that point this could be an extraordinary theme for you to use.</p><p></p><p>If you are attempting to pick subjects that are identified with a specific wellbeing theme, at that point the alternatives that you have will be considerably more various. Wellbeing points incorporate subjects, for example, diet, the historical backdrop of the idea of eating healthy, how nourishmen ts influence our bodies, and even creation solid food decisions. It can even be a plan to give a framework of what a smart dieting plan would comprise of.</p><p></p><p>Another region where you can discover subjects that can fit pleasantly is in the region of religion. Strict subjects can incorporate anything from conversations about religion, to things that individuals see as destructive to them, to whole books expounded on the point. For this situation, it may be a smart thought to utilize an expansive theme and permit understudies to think of an intriguing contention for it dependent on their own beliefs.</p><p></p><p>Other zones that you can browse are diverse passionate points. One of the most widely recognized enthusiastic points is what is identified with misfortune and misery. These points can incorporate things like deprivation, managing misfortune, and managing melancholy in the wake of losing a cherished one.</p><p&g t;</p><p>The last theme that you can utilize depends on the possibility of science. Numerous understudies may be interested about subjects that manage advancement when all is said in done. This can be an extremely fascinating subject to expound on in light of the fact that there are a great deal of understudies who might truly want to find out about it.</p><p></p><p>As you can see, there are different points that you can look over with regards to your youngsters' examination paper. With such a large number of subjects to browse, you will have the option to make an incredible theme and furthermore get a ton of extraordinary criticism from the understudies that you work with.</p>